On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:43 -0700, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/09/2009 09:39 AM, Anil Veerabhadrappa wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 00:15 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> >> Mike Christie wrote:
> >>> Anil Veerabhadrappa wrote:
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
> >>> b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
> >>>> index f741219..98148f3 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
> >>>> @@ -1653,15 +1653,18 @@ static struct iscsi_endpoint
> >>> *bnx2i_ep_connect(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> >>>> struct iscsi_endpoint *ep;
> >>>> int rc = 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (shost)
> >>>> + if (shost) {
> >>>> /* driver is given scsi host to work with */
> >>>> hba = iscsi_host_priv(shost);
> >>>> - else
> >>>> + /* Register the device with cnic if not already
> >>> done so */
> >>>> + bnx2i_register_device(hba);
> >>>> + } else
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * check if the given destination can be reached through
> >>>> * a iscsi capable NetXtreme2 device
> >>>> */
> >>>> hba = bnx2i_check_route(dst_addr);
> >>>> +
> >>>> if (!hba) {
> >>>> rc = -ENOMEM;
> >>>> goto check_busy;
> >>> Do you want to do the test_bit(BNX2I_CNIC_REGISTERED,
> >>> &hba->reg_with_cnic) test here instead of down below. If it
> >>> failed then
> >>> you might try to do a cm_create on a cnic that is not
> >>> properly registered.
> >>>
> >> Good idea. cm_create() will properly be ok because there is no
> >> hardware interaction. bnx2i_send_conn_ofld_req() will fail if
> >> the cnic is not properly registered because there will be no call
> >> backs from the hardware events.
> >
> > following 2 conditions needs to be satisfied to offload an iscsi
> > connection,
> > 1) device has to be registered with cnic
> > 2) device has to support iscsi offload
> >
> > bnx2i_adapter_ready() will return success only if both conditions
> > (which is flagged by ADAPTER_STATE_UP bit in hba->adapter_state) are
> > met. bnx2i_ep_connect() will bailout if bnx2i_adapter_ready() does not
> > return correct status and this guarantees bnx2i will not make any cnic
> > calls on an unregistered device.
> >
>
> Ok then. It seems fine to me.
>
> Reviewed-by Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> One other question though. Do you need the BNX2I_CNIC_REGISTERED tst in
> ep_connect then? If not then maybe in separate patch for the next
> feature window we can clean that up.
>
>
It is not required to test for BNX2I_CNIC_REGISTERED because a
successful return from bnx2i_adapter_ready() implicitly means the device
is registered with cnic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
