On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:21:19 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/10/2009 11:52 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:45:14 +0300 > > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> > >> The fact that ALL block drivers call it for proper service of ALL ULDS, > >> does it not make it a rule? > > > > BSG SMP code is not ULD. > > > > BSG is certainly a ULD, Upper-Layer-Driver that can issue block commands > through block layer and block-queue. > > SMP is a block device class that has it's own LLDs. > > The way I understand > > |---------| |--------------| |-----------| > | ULD |----->| block layer |----->| block LLD | > |---------| |--------------| |-----------| > > So I meant block ULD or block layer user code. That is what I meant > by ULD, what do you mean? To me, ULD means SCSI upper layer driver, which is documented. Where can I find a document about your definition of Block ULD, block LLD, etc? > <snip> > > > > FYI, you live in a land where very few live. > > > > I thought I was working on the Linux-Kernel. Is there another > place I should be? To me, looks like there is a different place for you. BTW, if you try to find a bio leak in the BSG SMP path, I guess that it's worth looking at the bounce path. There might be a leak. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
