On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:09:33PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Thanks Al, very much. It is exactly what I was hoping for, but could not > figure out for myself. > > I will give it an hard testing ASAP, and will queue it for next kernel (2.6.31). > > Can I take the osd cleanup hunk form your patchset + Randy's fix and serialize them > together with this through the scsi tree? (Together with the rest of the osd patches) > Is your patchset dependent on the osd bit for removal of some code? If so then I'll > send this patch through your tree so not to have conflicts in linux-next. Actually, git should manage such merge just fine, so -next is probably not a concern. In any case, if there are any problems with the merge I can take that chunk out - nothing depends on it yet in the public queue. Or I could take this incremental in vfs tree - also not a problem... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
