On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 22:06 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> some minor sd.c fixups against linux-next
>
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ static void sd_shutdown(struct device *d
> return; /* this can happen */
>
> if (sdkp->WCE) {
> - sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Synchronizing SCSI cache\n");
> + sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Synchronizing disk cache\n");
> sd_sync_cache(sdkp);
> }
>
> @@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@ static int sd_suspend(struct device *dev
> return 0; /* this can happen */
>
> if (sdkp->WCE) {
> - sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Synchronizing SCSI cache\n");
> + sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Synchronizing disk cache\n");
> ret = sd_sync_cache(sdkp);
> if (ret)
> goto done;
So you want it to say
sda: synchronizing disk cache
instead of
sda: synchronizing SCSI cache
I don't really see that buying us anything in terms of clarity. What's
the actual problem it solves?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
