Hi Mike,
Mike Christie wrote:
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>>> static const struct scsi_dh_devlist alua_dev_list[] = {
>>> - {"HP", "MSA VOLUME" },
>>> - {"HP", "HSV101" },
>>> - {"HP", "HSV111" },
>>> - {"HP", "HSV200" },
>>> - {"HP", "HSV210" },
>>> - {"HP", "HSV300" },
>>> - {"IBM", "2107900" },
>>> - {"IBM", "2145" },
>>> - {"Pillar", "Axiom" },
>>> - {"Intel", "Multi-Flex"},
>>> - {NULL, NULL}
>>> + {"", "", 3 },
>>> + {NULL, NULL, 0}
>>> };
>
> Is this going to make problems for the what the module alias patches
> were trying to do?
>
> Will userspace have to check for the mod alias stuff for scsi_dh_emc,
> scsi_dh_hp and scsh_dh_rdac, then for scsh_dh_alua does it check for the
> scsi devices sysfs tpgts file to see if ALUA is support?
Well, these patch actually precedes the modalias support, so obviously
we'll have to rework that to take everything (devtype, tpgs, vendor, model)
into account.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
