Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
static const struct scsi_dh_devlist alua_dev_list[] = { - {"HP", "MSA VOLUME" }, - {"HP", "HSV101" }, - {"HP", "HSV111" }, - {"HP", "HSV200" }, - {"HP", "HSV210" }, - {"HP", "HSV300" }, - {"IBM", "2107900" }, - {"IBM", "2145" }, - {"Pillar", "Axiom" }, - {"Intel", "Multi-Flex"}, - {NULL, NULL} + {"", "", 3 }, + {NULL, NULL, 0} };
Is this going to make problems for the what the module alias patches were trying to do?
Will userspace have to check for the mod alias stuff for scsi_dh_emc, scsi_dh_hp and scsh_dh_rdac, then for scsh_dh_alua does it check for the scsi devices sysfs tpgts file to see if ALUA is support?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
