On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 06:34:55PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > Actually, afraid not, you're trapped in the confusing maze of ASC/ASCQ > codes, all sounding alike but meaning slightly different things: > 0x24/0x00 is Invalid Field in CDB. The problem I'm having is 0x20/00 > (Invalid Command Operation Code). Ooh, so close! > This will fix it, though ... I'll just merge it into your patch. That's fine. I'd like it if we had a set of inline functions called things like 'invalid_command_operation_code()', but we don't, so I have no objections to this patch. I think merging it in is probably best. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
