RE: [RFC] FC pass thru - Rev V

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: James Smart [mailto:James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:14 AM
> 
> Trying to kick-start this again...
> I've updated the prior RFC with the comments from Seokmann,
> SvenFujita, and Boaz. I would still like review on the
> blk_xxx completion calls in the std and error paths.
<snip>
> +static int
> +fc_bsg_map_buffer(struct fc_bsg_buffer *buf, struct request *req)
> +{
> +	size_t sz = (sizeof(struct scatterlist) * req->nr_phys_segments);
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!req->nr_phys_segments);
> +
> +	buf->sg_list = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!buf->sg_list)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	sg_init_table(buf->sg_list, req->nr_phys_segments);
> +	buf->sg_cnt = blk_rq_map_sg(req->q, req, buf->sg_list);
> +	buf->payload_len = req->data_len;
> +	return 0;
> +}
It looks like that there is possibility that the dma buffer with more
than one sg element for ELS services - which is not allowed per FC spec.
I've seen a couple of times from the driver testing.
I'm looking for some ways to making sure the ELS services
to get single sg for both request/reply_payload.
Any comments/suggestion?

Thank you,
Seokmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux