Hi Christoph, On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: >> The default order of kmalloc-8192 on 2*4 stoakley is an issue of calculate_order. >> >> >> slab_size order name >> ------------------------------------------------- >> 4096 3 sgpool-128 >> 8192 2 kmalloc-8192 >> 16384 3 kmalloc-16384 >> >> kmalloc-8192's default order is smaller than sgpool-128's. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You reverted the page allocator passthrough patch before this right? > Otherwise kmalloc-8192 should not exist and allocation calls for 8192 > bytes would be converted inline to request of an order 1 page from the > page allocator. Yup, I assume that's the case here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
