On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:08:24 +0300 Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wouldn't object if Nicholas des the same and send in linux-scsi > and linux-kernel a complete patchset, which we will review and > discuss. But he sends *intermediate* patches and this looks for me > like a violation of fundamental rules/intention of Linux kernel > mailing lists, hence I complain. > > So, should I understand your words that you agree if I also start > sending intermediate patches for SCST to linux-scsi/linux-kernel? > <looking in as an outsider> I am thoroughly surprised by this email exchange. >From where I sit, there is almost no such thing as posting patches too early. Really. Transparency and early review/feedaback is by far more important than ignoring a few more patches in an area you don't careabout. Your second paragraph makes me wonder if your email is more political than technical in nature. But either way, you should feel encouraged to release early, release often. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
