Re: Spamming linux-kernel and linux-scsi by out-of-tree patches (LIO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




James Bottomley, on 01/26/2009 06:37 PM wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 16:17 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Nicholas,

Could you stop spamming linux-kernel and linux-scsi mailing lists by patches for your out-of-tree LIO project, please?

Those mailing lists are intended for patches for in-kernel components only, not for all out-of-tree projects, finding their ways into the mainline. I don't see any reason why your project should be an exception. Think, what a mess the kernel mailing lists would get, if all out-of-tree projects started sending their patches to them?

Actually, out of tree projects trying to make their way upstream are
welcome to use the various linux- mailing lists to solicit feedback and
review.  This method was, for instance, how FCoE made it in.

Hmm, I might be wrong, but what I've seen that FCoE only at the beginning used linux-scsi for its intermediate patches, then such patches quickly went into FCoE internal development mailing list only. Then only resulting patches intended for wide review and mainline inclusion were sent to linux-scsi. This is how I thought it's usually considered should be done and how all the projects I've seen so far did.

I wouldn't object if Nicholas does the same and send in linux-scsi and linux-kernel a complete patchset, which we will review and discuss. But he sends *intermediate* patches and this looks for me like a violation of fundamental rules/intention of Linux kernel mailing lists, hence I complain.

So, should I understand your words that you agree if I also start sending intermediate patches for SCST to linux-scsi/linux-kernel?

My personal practical concerns about your patches that they trigger my e-mail filters, so I have to spend on them much more time than I would want.

I've found that spamassassin does a good job of marking patches as non
spam.  Also, if you're using zmailer, vger seems to have some type of
patch recognition system built in which might be worth co-opting.

Thanks for the suggestions, but, unfortunately, none of those filters can distinguish e-mails/patches sent by Nicholas Bellinger in some important SCSI target related discussion from his unsolicited intermediate patches, which I should ignore.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux