Re: libata / scsi separation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:33:48AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> And yeap we definitely should try to do that too but I don't think
> RW_SG would be as useless as jumbo frames (much less compatibility
> problem and no loss of functionality), and the actual hardware
> overhead of issuing separate commands for each 4k segment is way
> higher than anything we do along the block and low level driver layers
> in terms of IO access, host bus and ATA (or SAS) bus overhead.

You're probably right that there's high overhead at the hardware level,
and we can't do anything about that.  There is some evidence that Linux
is the limiting factor in SSD performance right now due to not being
able to get enough commands to the device.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux