Re: [GIT PATCH] intermediate SCSI updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> This represents all the pieces of SCSI which were depending on the
> already merged block tree.

Grr. And it doesn't actually compile.

  drivers/scsi/sd.c:579:27: error: macro "sd_dif_op" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
  drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function ʽsd_prep_fnʼ:
  drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: ʽsd_dif_opʼ undeclared (first use in this function)
  drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
  drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: for each function it appears in.)

Hmm? Was this testedt AT ALL? It can never compile unless that idiotic 
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY option is set that no sane person would set right 
now, and which is even documented to not be enabled by default:

  If in doubt, say N.

yet it looks like it has not compiled since a commit that was put in in 
the middle of September!

What part of "This is total untested crap" are we missing here?

Yeah, I'm grumpy. I expect to not be fed shit like this. It has apparently 
been rebased several times, and all apparently with no testing 
what-so-ever!

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux