On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:53:49 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:35 -0400, James Smart wrote: > > When the updated scsi dma code was introduced recently, it assumed the > > physical host/adapter was the parent of the scsi host. Unfortunately, > > on FC virtual ports, the parent of the scsi host is the virtual port, > > which does not have dma information. > > Hmm, so now we have nested hosts; I'd missed that piece; we might be in > trouble in other places than just here. This is a problem that we met one year ago? http://marc.info/?t=118312464100002&r=1&w=2 vport's shost is not initialized like a normal shost so it doesn't have dma information. The updated patch looks nice. I should have done it at the time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
