Re: Kernel Level Generic Target Mode control path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What would be if a program, who taken that mutex get dead before releasing
> it? You wouldn't receive a notification about its death, although with
> IOCTL's you would receive it. Will you invent a motex revoking mechanism for
> that.

Any mutex that has been locked by kernel code should be unlocked
before control is given back to userspace. Making kernel mutexes
visible to userspace would be very bad design.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux