Re: Kernel Level Generic Target Mode control path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Thus, I would suggest that before making the further move we should also consider configuration interfaces of SCST and LIO and choose the best things from all 3.

So, Ming mentioned configfs for this...  /me reads about configfs


Ah yes, I remember now, this is part of the OCFS2 patchset and it uses
it for /config/cluster/ocfs2/[heartbeat,node] information, as well as
other tunables related to millisecond timeout values.  These are
basically the values from /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf..

Looking at http://lwn.net/Articles/148973/, this looks like a strong
contender for what we would require with a generic kernel level target
engine.

For our task I don't think configfs has any advantage over sysfs.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux