FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Hmm, really? STGT development is more active IET.
Tomo-san, be honest. It was *you*, who stopped the IET development,
forcing people to switch to STGT. There is no point to prepare patches
for IET, if they will never get merged.
I stopped working on IET but it doesn't mean that I force others to
stop working on IET. Arne said that he merges patches.
Well, how about declaring unlimited code freeze for all core parts?
Why is it difficult for you to understand what I wrote? I wrote again:
I stopped working on IET but it doesn't mean that I force others to
stop working on IET.
You stopped working on it, but you didn't stop maintaining it, did you?
The were neither announcement of it, nor request for somebody else to do
the maintainership work. So, for everybody you remained the maintainer
and the only person who can accept or reject patches.
Has anybody, except you, had a right to merge patches to IET?
Nobody asked me to give a right to merge patches to IET. When Arne
asked me, I was happy to give it him because he has a good knowledge
of IET code.
Great position! You put yourself as misunderstood. But the problem that
everybody misunderstood you and it's really hard to believe that you
wasn't aware of it.
In fact, it was *you* who should have asked about the replacement. It's
pretty regular practice in Open Source, when people get bored of some
project and gracefully pass its maintainership to someone other.
Which %% of
coming non-trivial patches have you merged in the last few years? Near
zero?
Probably, near zero because I stopped working on IET. What does 'stop
working on something' mean for you?
For instance, how many not too bad patches from Ross S. W. Walker
were silently ignored? He didn't received even small comments, which
made him so frustrated, so he stopped all the development activities?
Several days ago on the mailing list, I saw that Ross works on IET
with Arne.
I have no idea why you think that you know better than me about the
project that I had maintained. But can you please stop talking about
wrong information? I can just ignore your wrong statements (I often
did) but I don't like to see other people misunderstanding.
This isn't only my impression, this is rather what people using IET
think. Everyone after digging in IET mailing list archive can find the
evidences. For instance, see this e-mail:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=13776875&framed=y
You didn't disprove it, although definitely read, because you replied on
the later message in that thread. So, what one should think after that
and after seeing a lot of good patches going to nowhere and only trivial
ones merged?
Thanks,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Scst-devel mailing list
Scst-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
