Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:42:51 +0400
Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hmm, really? STGT development is more active IET.
Tomo-san, be honest. It was *you*, who stopped the IET development, forcing people to switch to STGT. There is no point to prepare patches for IET, if they will never get merged.

I stopped working on IET but it doesn't mean that I force others to
stop working on IET. Arne said that he merges patches.

Well, how about declaring unlimited code freeze for all core parts? Has anybody, except you, had a right to merge patches to IET? Which %% of coming non-trivial patches have you merged in the last few years? Near zero? For instance, how many not too bad patches from Ross S. W. Walker were silently ignored? He didn't received even small comments, which made him so frustrated, so he stopped all the development activities?

Vlad

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux