[ I have received two failure notice for this e-mail, because html. Seem all destinatary and carbon copy has received it, I hope ...]
Hi Andrew,
I have tryed without load the nvidia module. The problem is the same.
I have attached to this e-mail dmesg output, after some seconds which I have connected usb card reader, and output of lsmod. I hope you find this useful. Attach my .config too. Probably is not useful, however you are the expert ...
I not put everything static, but I put static only things which are always in use and connected to my desktop. Some things which I use only sometime, i.e. card reader, then compile it as module. I never use firewire at alI, then I never compile it. I use this method from ago on the notebook too and always work well.
Excuse me for my bad English.
Best Regards
--- Lun 11/8/08, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
Da: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Oggetto: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11302] New: I get a kernel OOPS! If I try to attach an usb card reader, SD, MMC, ecc.. to my Slamd64
A: "Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pinc_o@xxxxxxxx, "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Data: Lunedì 11 agosto 2008, 08:33
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:45:53 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:53:44 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via
the
> > bugzilla web interface).
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > >
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11302
> > >
> > > Summary: I get a kernel OOPS! If I try to attach an
usb card
> > > reader, SD, MMC, ecc.. to my Slamd64
> > > Product: IO/Storage
> > > Version: 2.5
> > > KernelVersion: 2.6.26.2
> > > Platform: All
> > > OS/Version: Linux
> > > Tree: Mainline
> > > Status: NEW
> > > Severity: blocking
> > > Priority: P1
> > > Component: SCSI
> > > AssignedTo: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ReportedBy: pinc_o@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > Is this a scsi regresion, or an mmc regression?
> >
OK. There have been some regressions in the scsi area but I
thought
that a) they were fixed and b) none manifested as an oops in
slave_alloc().
Perhaps James can take a look please?
> There are no USB based "real" MMC controllers, so I'd say
SCSI.
>
> > > If attach my usb card reader, without load mmc_block an mmc_core
modules, then
> > > the follow OOPS appear(If first load them, simply doesn't
mount the SD. Please
> > > note: I always use "automatic loading kernel modules"
compiled in "my" kernelS.
> > > But from many time, the recent kernelS not load the mmc_block
module):
>
> I don't know what kind of weird ass scripts loaded them for USB mass
> storage to begin with. As for the claimed lack of crashes when loaded;
> no idea as there is no interaction between the SCSI and MMC layer.
>
> > > Modules linked in: nvidia(P) [last unloaded: nvidia]
>
> This is always
a good start..
I very much doubt it.
Paolo, can you please check to see if the crash happens in a kernel
into which the nvidia driver has never been loaded?
Posta, news, sport, oroscopo: tutto in una sola pagina.
Crea l'home page che piace a te!
www.yahoo.it/latuapaginaAttachment:
lsmod.out
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
dmesg.out
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
.config
Description: Binary data
