On Tuesday 12 August 2008 03:02:46 pm David Miller wrote: > From: Divy Le Ray <divy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:57:09 -0700 > > > In any case, such a stateless solution is not yet designed, whereas > > accelerated iSCSI is available now, from us and other companies. > > So, WHAT?! > > There are TOE pieces of crap out there too. Well, there is demand for accerated iscsi out there, which is the driving reason of our driver submission. > > It's strictly not our problem. > > Like Herbert said, this is the TOE discussion all over again. > The results will be the same, and as per our decisions wrt. > TOE, history speaks for itself. Herbert requested some benchmark numbers, I consequently obliged. Cheers, Divy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
