Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.1] Add scsi_execute_async_fifo()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:53:22PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Regarding scsi_execute_async(): I didn't know that this API is on its
way out. What will it be replaced by, and when ?

blk_execute_rq/blk_execute_rq_nowait plus the block level helpers built
ontop to build requests.

scsi_execute_async() is already a nice and simple helper function on top blk_execute_rq_nowait(). What's the point then to remove it? Do you consider that exposing scsi_execute_async() internals to its users is better?


The problem with it is the use of sg list to *hack* in bio's. Which totally ignores/duplicates block layer mechanisms. There is pending a large patchset
that removes the use of scsi_execute_async from sg/sr and friends to use blk_map_*
members and directly call blk_execute_*. The original patchset was written by
Mike Christie but is now brought up to date by Tomo. It should be submitted soon I think.
If you need good example of usage check out bsg.c it maps user-space data in all kind
of combinations. If you have kernel space memory it is even simpler.

Bart.
---end quoted text---



If you need any help, please feel free to ask.

Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux