On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:22 +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: > is there any sens in adding more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host > or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors? > > e.g. put out SAS_ADDR(task->dev->sas_addr) so that we know whether > the error is always occuring on one phy/port/etc. ? > > the reason for doing this is basically my problems with the aic94xx > driver, outlined in http://marc.info/?t=120603924200004. Probably not really ... it looks like a standard protocol error thrown by a Seagate driver, as I said. Did reducing the queue depth and increasing the retries have any mitigating effect at all? The correct fix, which is to handle the REQ_TASK_ABORT on the fly is still in the works. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
