Re: [RFC] block: fix barrier error transmission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 21:08 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-barrier.c b/block/blk-barrier.c
> > index 55c5f1f..3a3947c 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-barrier.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-barrier.c
> > @@ -114,18 +114,24 @@ void blk_ordered_complete_seq(struct request_queue *q, unsigned seq, int error)
> >  
> >  static void pre_flush_end_io(struct request *rq, int error)
> >  {
> > +	error = rq->errors ? -EIO : error;
> > +
> >  	elv_completed_request(rq->q, rq);
> >  	blk_ordered_complete_seq(rq->q, QUEUE_ORDSEQ_PREFLUSH, error);
> >  }
> 
> It's a bit of a hack, SCSI really should pass the error value back
> instead of fiddling around with possibly perhaps finding it in ->errors.
> And please don't use these ?: constructs, in this case it doesn't even
> make a lot of sense and a
> 
>         if (rq->errors)
>                 error = -EIO;
> 
> would have been much cleaner ;-)
> 
> So my question is why does the model not allow you to return the error
> properly?

I thought it was the sg_io that would be the problem, but apparently on
further research, it simply discards the error as does scsi_execute_req.

I suppose that's a strong enough reason to try returning an error ...
I'm just a bit leery this close to a release.

I think this will work ... it just really needs quite a bit of
testing ...

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 1b199e1..67f412b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 	int this_count = scsi_bufflen(cmd);
 	struct request_queue *q = cmd->device->request_queue;
 	struct request *req = cmd->request;
-	int clear_errors = 1;
+	int error = 0;
 	struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
 	int sense_valid = 0;
 	int sense_deferred = 0;
@@ -853,7 +853,6 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 	if (blk_pc_request(req)) { /* SG_IO ioctl from block level */
 		req->errors = result;
 		if (result) {
-			clear_errors = 0;
 			if (sense_valid && req->sense) {
 				/*
 				 * SG_IO wants current and deferred errors
@@ -865,6 +864,8 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 				memcpy(req->sense, cmd->sense_buffer,  len);
 				req->sense_len = len;
 			}
+			if (!sense_deferred)
+				error = -EIO;
 		}
 		if (scsi_bidi_cmnd(cmd)) {
 			/* will also release_buffers */
@@ -885,14 +886,11 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 				      "%d bytes done.\n",
 				      req->nr_sectors, good_bytes));
 
-	if (clear_errors)
-		req->errors = 0;
-
 	/* A number of bytes were successfully read.  If there
 	 * are leftovers and there is some kind of error
 	 * (result != 0), retry the rest.
 	 */
-	if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 0, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
+	if (scsi_end_request(cmd, error, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
 		return;
 
 	/* good_bytes = 0, or (inclusive) there were leftovers and


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux