Re: transport_class: BUG if we can't release the attribute container

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley wrote:
<snip> 
> Well, we can agree to differ on this.  The camp that wants no side
> effects for BUG_ON() does so in case they want to define it to be a nop.
> I've always argued that having special rules for this that differ from
> functions is asking for trouble.  It's also easy to preserve the side
> effects by making the compile out do this:
> 
> #define BUG_ON(x) (void)(x)
> 
> That lets the compiler process the side effects and discard the result.
> This basically means the rules for BUG_ON() arguments are identical to
> the rules for function arguments ... I think that's consonant with the
> principle of least surprise.
> 

The Kernel seems to agree with you:
#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while(0)

what should we do with stuff like
	BUG_ON(check_foo_valid()); 
which is time consuming and should not run on production machines

should we directly use:
#ifdef CONFIG_BUG
or is there some other facility for that?

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux