Re: [PATCH 1/5] add scsi_build_sense_buffer helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:10:09 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 01:54 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > This adds scsi_build_sense_buffer, a simple helper function to build
> > sense data in a buffer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/scsi/scsi_eh.h    |    5 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > index 1221d2c..85add5b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > @@ -1993,3 +1993,33 @@ int scsi_get_sense_info_fld(const u8 * sense_buffer, int sb_len,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_get_sense_info_fld);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * scsi_build_sense_buffer - build sense data in a buffer
> > + * @desc:	Sense format (non zero == descriptor format,
> > + * 		0 == fixed format
> > + * @buf:	Where to build sense data
> > + * @key:	Sense key
> > + * @asc:	Additional sense code
> > + * @ascq:	Additional sense code qualifier
> > + * @addlen:	Additional sense length
> > + *
> > + **/
> > +void scsi_build_sense_buffer(int desc, u8 *buf, u8 key, u8 asc, u8 ascq,
> > +			     int addlen)
> > +{
> > +	if (desc) {
> > +		buf[0] = 0x72;	/* descriptor, current */
> > +		buf[1] = key;
> > +		buf[2] = asc;
> > +		buf[3] = ascq;
> > +		buf[7] = addlen;
> > +	} else {
> > +		buf[0] = 0x70;	/* fixed, current */
> > +		buf[2] = key;
> > +		buf[7] = addlen;
> > +		buf[12] = asc;
> > +		buf[13] = ascq;
> > +	}
> 
> This doesn't look quite right ... if you're using this call to
> manufacture sense data, you're always doing it at a fixed size, aren't
> you (i.e. addlen is always 0 for descriptor format and 10 for fixed
> format, isn't it)?  So we should just hard code that rather than
> requiring it to be passed in.

Fixed. I just thought that someone (likely scsi_debug) would build
more complicated sense data but probably nobody will do that (and LLDs
can overwrite the value if necessary).


> Also, the libata piece needs to go to linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as well.

I CC'ed this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux