http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 ------- Comment #4 from pkoutoupis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-20 09:53 ------- Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6. Seeing how we discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older products that were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with this patch. The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance. Regards, Petros Koutoupis bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 ------- Comment #3 from anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-20 06:52 ------- Reply-To: James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 > > > protasnb@xxxxxxxxx changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |protasnb@xxxxxxxxx > AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > |bugs.osdl.org | > > > > > ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-20 00:34 ------- > Petros, > This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest > kernels, or this support is already implemented there? Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS scan will already have taken care of all of this. James Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6.<br> <br> Seeing how we discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older products that were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with this patch.<br> <br> The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance.<br> <br> Regards,<br> <br> Petros Koutoupis<br><br><b><i>bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280<br><br><br><br><br><br>------- Comment #3 from anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-20 06:52 -------<br>Reply-To: James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br><br>On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br>wrote:<br>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280<br>> <br>> <br>> protasnb@xxxxxxxxx changed:<br>> <br>> What |Removed |Added<br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> CC| |protasnb@xxxxxxxxx<br>> AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br>> |bugs.osdl.org |<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-20 00:34 -------<br>> Petros,<br>> This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest<br>> kernels, or this support is already implemented there?<br><br>Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS<br>scan will already have taken care of all of this.<br><br>James<br><br><br>-- <br>Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email<br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------<br>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.<br></blockquote><br> -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
