> Look further down in the email, queue_bounce_to_mask() or whatever you > would want to call it. As also written there, the PRINCIPLE is the same. > And that is that exporting a to_allocator_mask() helper is a lot saner > than exporting an allocator api tied to the queue. > > Can we get over this, please? Ok it would have helped if you had explained why it is saner, but I bow to your superior experience on block layer issues. The only open issue is right now if it isn't better to go back for automatic bouncing for SCSI scan and the other users. Do you have an opinion on that too? If you have one can you please convince James of it too. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
