On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:51 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote: > A similar change went into the SAS/SATL layer I support > shortly after I posted the version which you forked off. > The git date of the commit is: Tue Feb 7 22:14:54 2006 -0800. Look, Luben; I don't mind you making an arse of yourself on the mailing lists; that's about par for the course nowadays. However, failing to report serious bugs you knew about in your code, and have known about for two years, is tantamount to sabotage ... especially when you've been reading the bug reports on the mailing list. I have to wonder how many more such bugs you've left in the code for users to find. > BTW, the problem you're "debugging" may require a protocol > trace and a sequencer update by Adaptec. I think you're fully aware that my test rig consists of a couple of SAS cards and drives donated by IBM and two expanders donated by LSI, plus a bit of equipment scavenged from Intel. I have no access to sophisticated tools like protocol analyzers. However, thanks for the advice and help. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
