On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:10 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > ian wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 18:49 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > >>> So ... it's been 4 months. Any new users merged? > >> At least dmam_declare_coherent_memory is completely unused as of > >> 2.6.25-rc* I plan to remove these. > > > > Please do not. > > Do you use dma_declare_* or dmam_declare_*. The first is used > currently. Only the second is unused. Ah, sorry, I missed the extra 'm' as I scanned the mail. We are using the former. > > Dmitry and I are still working on getting the users of this into the > > kernel. > > Is there a time frame on when will this happen? Will you be ready > for the .26 merge window? I think the big sticking point now is getting the generic clock interface merged - Dmitry is working hard on that. The rest of the code is pretty clean now. > Well if it takes longer the best strategy might be to remove > unused stuff now and you just readd what you need when you > really need it in tree. I think that would not be the best path now. btw, kernel-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx appears to be a dead list these days. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
