Re: [PATCH] scsi_error: Fix language abuse.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:32:54 -0500
Douglas Gilbert <dougg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Cox wrote:
The word "illegal" has a precise dictionary meaning of "prohibited by
law".
Also "contrary to or forbidden by official rules, regulations, etc".

The OED I have here doesn't seem to think so, however if the words are
the ones used in the T10 documentation then I'm happy to drop the patch.

The OED (Oxford English dictionary) seems to be at odds
with most other online dictionaries with respect to the
word illegal. I find the following 'illegal' entry
(at www.askoxford.com) daft:
 "USAGE Both illegal and unlawful can mean 'contrary to
  or forbidden by law', but unlawful has a broader meaning
  'not permitted by rules': thus handball in soccer is
  unlawful, but not illegal."

So if we followed the OED's advice then SCSI's "illegal
request" would become "unlawful request". I'm yet to
see the word "unlawful" in any technical standard ...

Doug Gilbert



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux