Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 6:50 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:For remotely accessing data, iSCSI+fs is quite simply more overhead than a networked fs. With iSCSI you are doing local VFS -> local blkdev -> network whereas a networked filesystem is local VFS -> networkThere are use cases than can be solved better via iSCSI and a filesystem than via a network filesystem. One such use case is when deploying a virtual machine whose data is stored on a network server: in that case there is only one user of the data (so there are no locking issues) and filesystem and block device each run in another operating system: the filesystem runs inside the virtual machine and iSCSI either runs in the hypervisor or in the native OS.
Hence the diskless root fs configuration I referred to in multiple emails... whoopee, you reinvented NFS root with quotas :)
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
