On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 01:11 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote: > Looks good except that "End LBA" is usually defined > to be something of the sort of "the LBA of the last > logical block accessed by the command" or "the LBA > of the logical block on which the command failed". > > A spec savvy editor of this code would be > "pleasantly" surprised if they had to use "end_lba", > and didn't pay attention that it was actually > "End LBA" + 1. Heh, well, that's where spec people and programmers part company. The universal expectation of a programmer in looping is for (a = beginning; a < end; a++) rather than <= if end were actually to point to last rather than last + 1. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
