Re: [PATCH] [RFC] sd: make error handling more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- On Fri, 2/1/08, Tony Battersby <tonyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Also, I disagree about treating recovered error like
> hardware/medium
> error.  Recovered error is supposed to mean "the last
> command completed
> successfully, with some recovery action performed by the
> device
> server".

Which then means that you agree with
commit 03aba2f7.

But the definition of RECOVERED ERROR immediately
after what you quoted, adds:
   "Details may be determined by examining the
additional sense bytes and the INFORMATION field."

Thus the patch I sent to you for you to try on
your hardware.

     Luben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux