Re: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:02:59 -0500
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ide <linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1201894847.3134.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)

James Bottomley wrote:

Could we please get this in ... I thought I mentioned several times that
it fixes a fatal oops in both aic94xx and ipr.


Tejun has a persistent objection...  see other email.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
  - From: James Bottomley

References:
- [PATCH] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
  - From: James Bottomley
- [PATCH RESEND] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
  - From: James Bottomley
- [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
  - From: James Bottomley

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/9] scsi_dh: scsi handling of REQ_LB_OP_TRANSITION
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] sd: make error handling more robust
Previous by thread: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]