Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 14:05:25 schrieb Boaz Harrosh: > On Thu, Jan 10 2008 at 14:33 +0200, Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > could you explain to me why this code can get away with allocating the > > sense buffer on the stack? > > > > static int sg_io(struct file *file, struct request_queue *q, > > struct gendisk *bd_disk, struct sg_io_hdr *hdr) > > { > > unsigned long start_time; > > int writing = 0, ret = 0, has_write_perm = 0; > > struct request *rq; > > char sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE]; > > > > Regards > > Oliver > > - > where? what? do you mean in scsi_ioctl.c? > why not it's a synchronous call? > Do you mean 96 bytes is too big? > Do you mean DMA alignment and cache coherency? I'm working > on that for scsi devices. Yes, you are doing DMA on the stack. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html