Re: [PATCH] blk request timeout minor fixes...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 05 2007, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Jens Axboe [jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > > This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
> > 
> > That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
> > thing. Care to cleanup the ->timeout usage so we can get by with using
> > just that field?
> 
> I added another field because I couldn't find a way to use just one
> field without breaking something! I will gladly clean it up if you
> find a way to fix it.

->timeout isn't used very much, so should not be too much work to
console the two.

If you see any specific obstacles, do list them!

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux