Re: [PATCH] blk request timeout minor fixes...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 03 2007, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox [matthew@xxxxxx] wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:53:30PM -0800, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Can I suggest running 'pahole' over this when compiled on 64-bit?
> > You've just introduced a 4-byte hole.
> 
> This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.

That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
thing. Care to cleanup the ->timeout usage so we can get by with using
just that field?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux