On Mon, Dec 03 2007, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Matthew Wilcox [matthew@xxxxxx] wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:53:30PM -0800, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Can I suggest running 'pahole' over this when compiled on 64-bit? > > You've just introduced a 4-byte hole. > > This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much. That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same thing. Care to cleanup the ->timeout usage so we can get by with using just that field? -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html