On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Anders Henke wrote:
> On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > @@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = {
> > .this_id = 7,
> > .cmd_per_lun = 1,
> > .use_clustering = ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
> > - .use_sg_chaining = ENABLE_SG_CHAINING,
> > + .use_sg_chaining = DISABLE_SG_CHAINING,
> > };
> >
> > static s32 adpt_scsi_register(adpt_hba* pHba)
>
> The structure to patch does look different and doesn't include an
> tag "use_sg_chaining":
>
> .this_id = 7,
> .cmd_per_lun = 1,
> .use_clustering = ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
Just add the line
.use_sg_chaining = DISABLE_SG_CHAINING,
> };
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
