On 2/6/25 12:54 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
After some further internal discussions: The set conditions are vendor specific; The device may set it as many times it wants depending on its criticality. The spec does not define that nor what the host should do. So there is this concern that some vendors will report multiple times, while other wont. Hence, reading critical_health = 1 might be misleading. What do you think?
How about emitting a uevent if a critical health condition has been reported by a UFS device? See also sdev_evt_send(). Thanks, Bart.
