On 9/12/24 10:47 PM, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
On 9/10/2024 2:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
+ ufshcd_process_device_init_result(hba, hba->device_init_start, err);
I have similar comment as in previous patch #6. This patch probably
changed the print. In the original code, it prints the time spent in
probe_hba(), but here it prints some part of the time spent in
ufshcd_init(). There will be some trace prints during init, but the data
it prints would have inconsistent meaning.
I will see what I can do about this.
Thanks,
Bart.
