Re: [PATCH 3/5] add sg segment limitation info to device structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Just looking at the number of devices, it seems that allocating it
> dynamically would be the better deal. We allocate the name of every
> kobject dynamically today, so I guess it's fine to do that with the
> DMA data too.

But we don't need to allocate it dynamically.  We can embed it in the
pci_dev, eisa_dev, zorro_dev, mca_dev and parisc_device.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux