Re: [PATCH 00/17] HSI2, UFS & UFS phy support for Tensor GS101

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alim,

Thanks for your review feedback.

On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:30, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 5:56 PM
> > To: mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > kishon@xxxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; avri.altman@xxxxxxx;
> > bvanassche@xxxxxxx; s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> > jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx; ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-
> > soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx; saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > willmcvicker@xxxxxxxxxx; Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH 00/17] HSI2, UFS & UFS phy support for Tensor GS101
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> > Question
> > ========
> >
> > Currently the link comes up in Gear 3 due to ufshcd_init_host_params()
> > host_params initialisation. If I update that to use UFS_HS_G4 for
> negotiation
> > then the link come up in Gear 4. I propose (in a future patch) to use VER
> > register offset 0x8 to determine whether to set G4 capability or not (if
> major
> > version is >= 3).
> >
> > The bitfield of VER register in gs101 docs is
> >
> > RSVD [31:16] Reserved
> > MJR [15:8] Major version number
> > MNR [7:4] Minor version number
> > VS [3:0] Version Suffix
> >
> > Can anyone confirm if other Exynos platforms supported by this driver have
> > the same register, and if it conforms to the bitfield described above?
> >
>
> VER (offset 0x8) is standard UFS HCI spec, so all vendor need to have this
> (unless something really wrong with the HW)
> Yes, Exynos and FSD SoC has these bitfield implemented.

Thanks for confirming! I will look to propose something once this
series is merged.

Peter.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux