Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >OK, we've had these competing patch sets floating around for two months
> >now.  Christoph and Jeff, can we get agreement on which is going in?
> 
> Well, my opinion is
> 
> 1) When judging by total amount of positive improvement, Christoph's 
> patches are superior -- he has more overall cleanups than I do.
> 
> 2) When judging by likelihood of inducing breakage, I feel my changes 
> are superior.  My gdth changes tightly adhere to the 
> equivalent-transformation method of shuffing code around, enabling 
> further improvements.  IOW, I resisted the urge to make cleanups and fix 
> insignificant, pre-existing bugs during the transformations.
> 
> 3) I am utterly unmotivated to merge the two patchsets.  Someone should 
> make an executive decision, pull one patchset, and drop the other.  My 
> coding "mood" has swung from cleaning up code to writing new SAS drivers :)

Go ahead with your patches as I don't have time working on mine right now.
I'll port them ontop of your patches when I get time for it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux