Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-qmp-ufs: Add High Speed Gear 5 support for SM8550

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/30/2023 5:34 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:49:12PM +0800, Can Guo wrote:


On 11/30/2023 4:38 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:14:25PM +0800, Can Guo wrote:

[...]

+static int qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg)
+{
+	u32 max_gear, floor_max_gear = cfg->max_supported_gear;
+	int i = NUM_OVERLAY - 1;

Just use i directly in the for loop. Also, please rename "i" with "idx" to make
it clear.

OK


+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	for (; i >= 0; i --) {

i--

+		max_gear = cfg->tbls_hs_overlay[i].max_gear;
+
+		if (max_gear == 0)
+			continue;

You are setting max_gear even for targets with a single overlay. How can this
become 0?

Say 8550 has two overlays, 8450 has one overlay. We are sweeping all
overlays as NUM_OVERLAY == 2, so for 8450, there is one overlay initialized,
another one not initialized (max_gear == 0), we are skipping the one which
is not initialized.


This is confusing at its best :) Please check for the existence of the actual
table instead. Like,

	for (idx = NUM_OVERLAY - 1; i >= 0, i--) {

		/* Skip if the table is not available */
		if (!cfg->tbls_hs_overlay[i].serdes)
			continue;

		...
	}

We cannot expect overlay must has its own serdes, or tx/rx/pcs, hence I am
checking max_gear intead of any specific member.


Hmm, then please add the comment as I suggested above.

Sure

Thanks,
Can Guo.




+
+		/* Direct matching, bail */
+		if (qmp->submode == max_gear)
+			return i;
+
+		/* If no direct matching, the lowest gear is the best matching */
+		if (max_gear < floor_max_gear) {
+			ret = i;
+			floor_max_gear = max_gear;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
    static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg)
    {
+	int i;
+	bool apply_overlay = false;
+
+	i = qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay(qmp, cfg);
+	if (i >= 0)
+		apply_overlay = true;

How about?

```
	int idx;

	idx = qmp_ufs_get_gear_overlay(qmp, cfg);

	qmp_ufs_serdes_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls);
	qmp_ufs_lanes_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls);
	...

	if (idx >= 0) {
		qmp_ufs_serdes_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_overlay[idx]);
		qmp_ufs_lanes_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_overlay[idx]);
		...
	}
```

Since the ordering doesn't matter for init sequence, you can program the overlay
tables under a single condition.

We can do that, but we need to be careful. When I say (in my previous reply)
the ordering does not matter, that saying is from the UFS PHY HPG doc.
However, in SW implementation, the 'tbls_hs_b' is actually overwriting one
COM_VCO_TUNE_MAP register, the same register is also programmed by common
table or overlay table. So qmp_ufs_serdes_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_b) should
come after overlays.


Then you can program tbls_hs_b after overlay tables. Wouldn't that work?

I am programming tbls_hs_b after overlay tables, just a heads up in case you
are surprised :).


Cool!

- Mani





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux