> I can see where you're coming from, but logically, this is wrong. > There's a huge slew of enterprise machines that only have DVD on SATA. ... and enterprise systems don't really care about a few KB more of code. In fact you definitely want to have SATA compiled in in case you need to recover the machine later when the SAN is down. > On the other hand, all of these machines will have SCSI disk devices on > various other transports, so no harm is done, it's just an inelegant > solution. Do you know of a better one? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
