On 17.09.23 02:35, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:59:31PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: >> The issue still can be reproduced on the latest linux tree[2]. >> To reproduce I need to run about 1000 times blktests block/001, and >> bisect shows it was introduced with commit[1], as it was not 100% >> reproduced, not sure if it's the culprit? > > Anyway, thanks for bisecting this regression. I'm adding it to regzbot: > > #regzbot ^introduced: 9257959a6e5b4f > #regzbot title: restructuring atomic locking conditionals causes vfs dentry lock protection failure #regzbot fix: 6d2779ecaeb56f #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
