Re: [czhong@xxxxxxxxxx: [bug report] WARNING: CPU: 121 PID: 93233 at fs/dcache.c:365 __dentry_kill+0x214/0x278]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17.09.23 02:35, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:59:31PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:
>> The issue still can be reproduced on the latest linux tree[2].
>> To reproduce I need to run about 1000 times blktests block/001, and
>> bisect shows it was introduced with commit[1], as it was not 100%
>> reproduced, not sure if it's the culprit?
> 
> Anyway, thanks for bisecting this regression. I'm adding it to regzbot:
> 
> #regzbot ^introduced: 9257959a6e5b4f
> #regzbot title: restructuring atomic locking conditionals causes vfs dentry lock protection failure

#regzbot fix: 6d2779ecaeb56f
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux