Re: [bug report] blktests srp/002 hang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2023/9/26 9:09, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 11:31 PM Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 2023/9/25 12:47, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 10:18 AM Rain River wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 2:14 AM Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/21/23 10:10, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
在 2023/9/21 22:39, Bob Pearson 写道:
On 9/21/23 09:23, Rain River wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:53 AM Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/20/23 12:22, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 9/20/23 10:18, Bob Pearson wrote:
But I have also seen the same behavior in the siw driver which is
completely independent.
Hmm ... I haven't seen any hangs yet with the siw driver.
I was on Ubuntu 6-9 months ago. Currently I don't see hangs on either.
As mentioned above at the moment Ubuntu is failing rarely. But it used to fail reliably (srp/002 about 75%
of
the time and srp/011 about 99% of the time.) There haven't been any changes to rxe to explain this.
I think that Zhu mentioned commit 9b4b7c1f9f54 ("RDMA/rxe: Add workqueue
support for rxe tasks")?
That change happened well before the failures went away. I was seeing failures at the same rate with tasklets
and wqs. But after updating Ubuntu and the kernel at some point they all went away.
I made tests on the latest Ubuntu with the latest kernel without the
commit 9b4b7c1f9f54 ("RDMA/rxe: Add workqueue support for rxe tasks").
The latest kernel is v6.6-rc2, the commit 9b4b7c1f9f54 ("RDMA/rxe: Add
workqueue support for rxe tasks") is reverted.
I made blktest tests for about 30 times, this problem does not occur.

So I confirm that without this commit, this hang problem does not
occur on Ubuntu without the commit 9b4b7c1f9f54 ("RDMA/rxe: Add
workqueue support for rxe tasks").

Nanthan

Thanks,

Bart.
This commit is very important for several reasons. It is needed for the ODP implementation
that is in the works from Daisuke Matsuda and also for QP scaling of performance. The work
queue implementation scales well with increasing qp number while the tasklet implementation
does not. This is critical for the drivers use in large scale storage applications. So, if
there is a bug in the work queue implementation it needs to be fixed not reverted.

I am still hoping that someone will diagnose what is causing the ULPs to hang in terms of
something missing causing it to wait.
Hi, Bob


You submitted this commit 9b4b7c1f9f54 ("RDMA/rxe: Add workqueue support for rxe tasks").

You should be very familiar with this commit.

And this commit causes regression.

So you should delved into the source code to find the root cause, then fix it.
Zhu,

I have spent tons of time over the months trying to figure out what is happening with blktests.
As I have mentioned several times I have seen the same exact failure in siw in the past although
currently that doesn't seem to happen so I had been suspecting that the problem may be in the ULP.
The challenge is that the blktests represents a huge stack of software much of which I am not
familiar with. The bug is a hang in layers above the rxe driver and so far no one has been able to
say with any specificity the rxe driver failed to do something needed to make progress or violated
expected behavior. Without any clue as to where to look it has been hard to make progress.
Bob

Work queue will sleep. If work queue sleep for long time, the packets
will not be sent to ULP. This is why this hang occurs.
In general work queue can sleep, but the workload running in rxe driver
should not sleep because it was originally running on tasklet and converted
to use work queue. A task can sometime take longer because of IRQs, but
the same thing can also happen with tasklet. If there is a difference between
the two, I think it would be the overhead of scheduring the work queue.

Difficult to handle this sleep in work queue. It had better revert
this commit in RXE.
I am objected to reverting the commit at this stage. As Bob wrote above,
nobody has found any logical failure in rxe driver. It is quite possible
that the patch is just revealing a latent bug in the higher layers.

To now, on Debian and Fedora, all the tests with work queue will hang.
And after reverting this commit,

no hang will occur.

Before new test results, it is a reasonable suspect that this commit
will result in the hang.

If the hang *always* occurs, then I agree your opinion is correct,

About hang tests, please read through the whole discussion. Several engineers made tests on Debian, Fedora and Ubuntu to confirm these test results.

Zhu Yanjun

but this one happens occasionally. It is also natural to think that
the commit makes it easier to meet the condition of an existing bug.



Because work queue sleeps,  ULP can not wait for long time for the
packets. If packets can not reach ULPs for long time, many problems
will occur to ULPs.
I wonder where in the rxe driver does it sleep. BTW, most packets are
processed in NET_RX_IRQ context, and work queue is scheduled only

Do you mean NET_RX_SOFTIRQ?

Yes. I am sorry for confusing you.

Thanks,
Daisuke


Zhu Yanjun

when there is already a running context. If your speculation is to the point,
the hang will occur more frequently if we change it to use work queue exclusively.
My ODP patches include a change to do this.
Cf.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7699a90bc4af10c33c0a46ef6330ed4bb7e7ace6.1694153251.git.matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.c
om/

Thanks,
Daisuke

My main motivation is making Lustre run on rxe and it does and it's fast enough to meet our needs.
Lustre is similar to srp as a ULP and in all of our testing we have never seen a similar hang. Other
hangs to be sure but not this one. I believe that this bug will never get resolved until someone with
a good understanding of the ulp drivers makes an effort to find out where and why the hang is occurring.
  From there it should be straight forward to fix the problem. I am continuing to investigate and am learning
the device-manager/multipath/srp/scsi stack but I have a long ways to go.

Bob



Jason && Leon, please comment on this.


Best Regards,

Zhu Yanjun

Bob




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux