On 8/14/23 05:36, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 8/12/23 06:35, Bart Van Assche wrote:
+ if (!rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock && blk_rq_is_seq_zoned_write(rq))
This condition could be written as a little inline helper
blk_req_need_zone_write_lock(), which could be used in mq-dealine patch 2.
Hi Damien,
Since q->limits.use_zone_write_lock is being introduced, how about
modifying blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() such that it tests that new member
variable instead of checking rq->q->disk->seq_zones_wlock? That would allow
me to leave out one change from block/mq-deadline.c. I do not have a strong
opinion about whether the name blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() should be
retained or whether that function should be renamed into
blk_req_use_zone_write_lock().
Thanks,
Bart.
