On 5/26/23 00:11, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Why would we want to when we don't have to?
Anyone is allowed to formulate objections to a patch but when objecting
to a patch or an approach please explain *why*. I think I already
explained that unconditionally enabling BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING makes testing
the UFS host controller driver easier.
So with those fixed and the vops->may_block instead of vops->nonblocking:
[ ... ]
I think a much simpler solution exists. I plan to post a new version of
this patch series soon.
Bart.
