RE: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> On 5/9/23 09:19, Avri Altman wrote:
> > Following your argument, then why fair allocation exists in the first place?
> 
> Does this patch answer your question?
> 
> [PATCH v2] block: Improve shared tag set performance
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230103195337.158625-1-
> bvanassche@xxxxxxx/
OK.

Why it was needed to invent a new flag instead of  just clear BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED?

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux